To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. The two tires have a similar width, with only .05 inch different (the Forekaster is the narrower of the two). CLP 27.5 x 2.60 Please. As Maxxis puts it, When an Aspen isnt enough tire but a Minion is too much, choose the new Maxxis Forekaster.. (New annually renewing membership only. 2.3 DHR2 3C and 2.3 Aggressor dual are my two main rear tyres. If that doesnt work try the next tire in your favorite manufacturers line. While the Maxxis DHRII comes in a vast array of widths, casings and rubber options, the only ones to look at here are the 2.3 and 2.4 widths with EXO protection. While XC tires might not get much love from us, we do ride most of them and also sell lots of them. Part of why they still have it in their line up is that it's popular as OE (cost reasons I guess). The new version of the Maxxis Forekaster has ditched any of its previous damp duties. Where it struggles is in sticky mud as the nobs aren't tall enough. But if this is more durable then it might be worth the extra weight. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. The forekaster has surprisingly good grip for it's weight, and it performs well in a wide range of conditions (dry loose over hard all the way to slightly greasy clay) but it is no doubt, a reduced rolling resistance xc/trail tire. The hang up there is it's only .15 of an inch difference, and Maxxis tires often times won't measure out to their stated dimensions, so I might be stuck with the same tread after a swap if I just get a bigger Rekon. That should work well for the conditions you describe, 2022 Trek Top Fuel 9.8XT. I have been a writer for nigh on 20 years, a photographer for 25 years and a mountain biker for 30 years. Theyre very tough too, particularly in the Snake Skin sidewall option. I know the 2.25 on my 29er and the 2.4 WT on my 27.5 measured out the same, and the 27.5 was on a rim that was 7mm wider internally. Same situation here, switched from a 2.6 Rekon to a 2.6 Forekaster up front for basically the same reason. The Ardent is also decently fast-rolling considering the tread height and does decently well with clearing mud as well. Thanks all, for the advice and recommendations. The DHR2 is a hell of a tyre on the back though. Looking for some rubber with bite? They didnt really need that many racy XC rubbers. But while the Ardent is dual-compound rubber in the center tread, the Forekaster is dual compound throughout. The 29er version with the durable DoubleDown casing we tested weighed 1,090 grams. Along with a spike-like design, most of the knobs or spikes also have generous siping, making sure those tall knobs conform to anything they can grab onto when the dirt gets slippery. CLP The tread isnt aggressive enough for thick loose soil or sandy conditions, and quickly loses traction in those conditions. While it doesn't get picked up as much as these other dry tires do, it holds its place in the Maxxis lineup for the XC/Trail mud tire. The Maxxis Forekaster used to sit squarely in the aggressive cross-country category, a tire with enough tread for slipperier conditions, but with a fairly low weight. Given their robust almost paddle-style centre tread blocks, the Trail Kings arent sluggish at all, something we can only attribute to the Black Chili compound. Maxxis have the Forekaster in both 27.5" and 29" models, in 2.25" width and 2.35" widths too. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. Its a good combination tire, but most users do note that there are other newer tires in the Maxxis line and others that outperform the Ardent as both a specialist tire and an all-purpose design. Like crack cocaine, the Schwalbe Hans Dampf tyres are expensive and addictive. If that doesnt work out the plan is to move it to the rear and put a Forekaster on the front. Coil fan. On the front, weve found the durability fantastic, even with the softer TrailStar compound. While the knobs are quite big compared to other XC/Trail tires, the rolling speed is pretty good when looking at the corners you will be able to take with this tire. I thought the old Forekaster was ok for what it was. And a digital membership where you can read all the digital magazines is normally 25, and now 12.50 with the code. The ardent race and icon if mostly hardpack trails. About Us | An Aspen is never enough in the front, and if it is, then you should be riding a gravel bike. This allows the center of the tire to roll fast providing just enough traction when climbing and braking but not comprising any speed. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. I am going to give it a try. When it comes to Maxxis' treads, people tend to gravitate to the established gravity-meats (i.e., the Minion or High Roller series) or the pinner XC treads, such as the Ikon. Well have to wait until we get hold of some in the flesh. This pretty much looks like a love child of the old Forekaster and the Assegai. The tread of the Minion is similar in design to the Ardent. This looks like a great tire. Front and rear for speed with matched sizing, Front 2.35 and rear 2.2 for volume and speed, Rekon 2.4 in the front and 2.25 in the rear, Rekon up front in with faster rolling Ikon or Ardent race out back, Rekon in the rear with Forekaster or Minion DHR II in the front, Ardent front and rear same size comes stock on many bikes, Ardent up front with Ikon or Ardent Race out back, Ardent in the rear with Forekaster in the front, Ardent in the rear with Minion DHR II up front, Front and rear same size has to be really wet for this, While the Maxxis DHRII might be considered to be an all-mountain/enduro/downhill tire, it provides a great grip to weight ratio when it's in the 2.3 widths and EXO protection. They are available in a 2.4 as well, but not in Australia at present. With amazing braking traction and generous siping, the grip and control from a Maxxis DHRII are off the charts compared to any other Maxxis XC tire. As with the other classic Maxxis tires, the Ardent is available in a huge range of sizes, casings and rubber options, so I will list our more common combinations and sizes that we see. Overall Conclusion When it comes to deciding on tires, the order of importance for me personally is grip, durability, then rolling resistance. No longer marketed as only a wet weather option for the XC world, Maxxis all-new tire takes aim at the quickly growing world of aggressive XC & Trail. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. The Maxxis Ardent is a light duty trail tire that rolls fast in dry conditions. The tread pattern is pretty unique. And something that doesnt have that Ardent-y gappy V-shape to the tread pattern (that I personally have never got along with).if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[728,90],'singletrackworld_com-leader-1','ezslot_6',666,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-singletrackworld_com-leader-1-0'); We dont have much in the way of info let only test samples so well have to make do with the press release and pics, THE ALL-NEW FOREKASTER COMING 2022 FOREKASTER. The forekaster has surprisingly good grip for it's weight, and it performs well in a wide range of conditions (dry loose over hard all the way to slightly greasy clay) but it is no doubt, a reduced rolling resistance xc/trail tire. It might not be as classic as some of the other Maxxis XC tires, but it will surely create some great traction without the weight of some other tires. For trail riders who don't want to lug around heavy enduro tires but still want plenty of traction, the new Forekaster gets itright. IMBA Epics | Run a 2.6 x 27.5 one on my hardtail for a lot of the year. Fast rolling, slidey in the corners, slippy on the rocks. Lighter than the equivalent dhr2 and on that bike it probably doesnt need as much grip as on the fs bike which has got a dhr2 on it in the slop. The Dissector is Maxxis' answer to consumers' desire for an all-around mountain bike tire, and given the fact that Aussie downhill pro Troy Brosnan was influential in its development, its versatility was baked in from the start. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire - Singletracks Mountain Bike News Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire Mountain bike trails & Mountain bike reviews Protected: Forums Mountain Bike Forum Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire Viewing 9 reply threads Author Posts June 1, 2019 at 19:52 #263456 pauldominy The side nobs are not as aggressive as those on the Ardent. I very much like my Forekaster front tire. Closely aligned ramped centre blocks improve braking while ensuring. I upgraded to a 2.25 Rekon up front. Having mid-height almost square knobs across the tire that is spaced out quite a bit, it's as close to an XC spike you can get. You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Forekaster EUR Maxxis' Ardent 2.4 is, in my opinion, the most underrated tire on the market. Its gaining 200g, or almost a pound for two of them, in unspring weight. There are intermediate knobs but spaced out quite a bit more than the other tread, leaving a gap where there isn't an intermediate knob. Part of that, Appleman Bicycles has released the 2XR FIT Crankset, available to buy or to rent, with the aim of helping riders find the perfect crank length, It wasnt until day three of the 23 Sea Otter Classic that Elliot Tanner, the Founder/CEO of Stashed finally flagged me down to show me. She would never say no because of the implication. More: The Best Bike Seats for Overweight Cyclists. For fast hardpack punctuated by loose, dry sections, the Dissector has few equals. With ramped center knobs and stepped alternating side knobs, the Ardent race has a great transition from the center to leaning the tire over. Currently, the Forekaster is only available in 29in. Best MTB Gear | Marked as a 2.35, they dwarf just about all other non-downhill specific tyres out there. USD The Minion is a significantly heavier tire than the Ardent, but with that said, there are some definite advantages to the Minion if youre an especially aggressive rider, or if you tend to ride very rocky trails or trails with loosely packed dirt. However, a tire like the Ardent thats less specialized and more of a generalist on the trail is also going to fall short of more specialized tires in their performance specialties. It measures 2.35 at the nobs and 2.3 at the casing on a 26mm internal width rim. The new Forekaster has certainly got closer spaced knobs but thats about the only thing theoretically less-wet-friendly about it. Prices start from 59.99 RRP. The harder-wearing PaceStar compound is recommended for the rear or youll be shelling out for new rubber very quickly. The Ardent is just a touch thicker than the Ikon, 2.4 compared to 2.2. However, the narrow casing and lack of tubeless options were lackluster at best. Forekaster being light filled a nice gap. Great control under braking with L shaped side knobs allow some confident riding for a tire that rolls this fast. Singletrack uses affiliate services calledSkimlinksandwhich means we may earn revenue if you buy a product after clicking a link to a retailer on our site. Hooks up nicely in most terrain. The Forekaster is Maxxis's closest to the Nic- it's tougher, and heavier, but very similiar. While it may no longer be marketed as a wet conditions specific tire, the new Forekaster is still designed to shed mud well, with raised edges on the casing. Thats not a huge surprise since Maxxis is well known for producing high quality and durable tire sets. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. When that tire loses cornering traction, it loses it right away and does not hook back up easily. Ardent Put in back and its durability and ability to take a hit really shine. The previous tire in 292.35 size was quoted at 745g. With their lower well-placed design, the pattern rolls well too. Ardent Race RUB Thats why you go 2.6 if you have the room. Were told that the 29 x 2.4 Dual compound will be available very soon, with prices ranging from $83 to $101. Visit the high-res gallery for more images. It also happens to be pretty light for the amount of traction it provides, which I don't think anyone will complain about. If the girl said no then the answer obviously is no, but she's not gonna say no. Rekon 2.6 up front and Rekon 2.4 rear. Wow, 945g is pretty porky for an aggressive XC tire, thats dissector territory. While it may no longer be marketed as a wet conditions specific tire, the new Forekaster is still designed to shed mud well, with raised edges on the casing. In fact, the Forekaster is going right back on (as a rear) for the summer. They use a 120tpi casing and are Tubeless Ready - with the option for EXO sidewall reinforcing. Its no weight weenie xc tire but it does roll much better than either of the Maxxis Minions. No complaints, wet, dry, good all around front trail use tire. Pairing a slightly meatier tire up front with a faster rolling tire out back is normally how we roll with our XC-ish, light-trail setups, which some might describe as "down-county" bikes. These look good, although hard to know where it sits vs the Dissector. As I said, this tire is a classic and finds itself in its fair share of combinations, so we'll list some of the more common tire combinations and sizes/casing options. Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox. I would not consider this the typical XC tire unless your typical XC race is the Downieville Classic where 3k feet of climbing is followed by 30mph+ descents. The center tread looks like a slimmed-down version of the High Roller II and the side knobs mimic the Minion, creating a lot of control you wouldn't expect from an XC tire. Id say its been a Dissector and Rekon as a guess. Something to sit between the Aspen/Ikon/Ardent and the Assegai/Minion/Dissector. It strikes a balance between speed and traction for the rear when riding aggressively. Much stiffer sidewalls then the Ardent and it performs well around 18/20 psi. Enter the Forekaster 29x2.35 Maxxis's unapologetic copy of the Schwalbe Nobby Nic. Black Chili compound wears well. Zach Overholt is the Editor in Chief of Bikerumor. Dissector will be more aggressive than this, I liked the Dissector but it did occasionally feel vague when leaned over due to the big gap between centre lugs and side tread. The Ardent, however, covers that vast middle ground and covers it damn well. Stable sidewalls. Ardent sidewalls seem to be a bit soft. I know the 2.25 on my 29er and the 2.4 WT on my 27.5 measured out the same, and the 27.5 was on a rim that was 7mm wider internally. The Forekaster is shifting. Durability is one of the areas that the Ardent really shines. The difference is this tire doesn't blow out sidewalls like the NN. Some of our partners may process your data as a part of their legitimate business interest without asking for consent. For similar rolling speed with improved braking and cornering performance, check out the Rekon. The Aspen has some small race size ramped knobs in the center with larger more aggressive side knobs. Dual compound or 3C MaxxTerra options EXO sidewall protection Tubeless Ready (TR) Bicycle technology Category: XC, Trail Seem to be the best combo of grip, price, durability, and weight. An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. Ready to go tubeless, installation is a breeze, and many cyclists report that the high durability of the Ardent makes is a great rear-tire design. That said, if you already have the appropriate tools and a pneumatic pump on hand, theres no reason no to speed the whole process up. It was also a Maxx Terra while the 29er was a Maxx Speed, and I couldn't tell any difference in performance between the two. I rode Ikons front and back on my 29er XC hardtail in 2.0 width for a while, but after a bit I started noticing the front was washing out more than I'd like. 111 [Podcast], Best of the Month! AUD Strengths: Meaty, moto-style tread digs into loose surfaces. Bontrager have really hit the mark with the XR4 tyres for all round aggressive trail use. They work great for getting loose when you want to. Good grip in a variety of conditions, decent volume, low drag, and peace of mind. Pinkbike Poll: How Many Volume Spacers Do You Run? It has the grip and predictable handling of bigger, burlier options with faster rolling speed and a little less weight. Especially mounted as a read tire, the Ardent is just a touch drifty, especially if you like to corner hot, but not so much that youre likely to lose control of the tire, much less the bike as a whole. The Aspen also clears mud very well and while it might not have the overall height of some mud tires, the spaced-out tread allows more clearing when the dirt gets thick. NZD, The Aspen has some small race size ramped knobs in the center with larger more aggressive side knobs. These aren't full-on XC race tires. Yeah, dissector, ardent, ardent race, high roller, are already in between minion and Aspen. Prior to that, Zach spent many years in the back of a bicycle shop building and repairing nearly every type of bike, while figuring out how to (occasionally) ride them. You can choose how much grip you want, how fast the tire rolls, and what wheel you want to put it on with Maxxis. Sign up to receive Bikerumor content direct to your inbox. He has been writing about whats new in the bicycle world for 12+ years. It also makes a great rear tire when looking for speed in the back and some more tread up front like what you would get with the Ardent, Ardent Race or Forekaster. Lastly, I simply can't trust a trail tire that doesn't have some sort of added protection. Ragley Big Wig, Surly Cross Check (gravel bike), Sunday Soundwave (BMX), 91 Schwinn High Plain (about town bike), Nashbar CXSS (on trainer). I was initially running a 2.35 Ikon on the back and while it has a surprising amount of grip, in the fall with the leaves on the ground, I found it lacking in traction when crawling up steep climbs and in the corners. However, the large outer tread still performs just as well with moderate and even severe pitting, and the rubber doesnt lose reactivity or traction with wear and tear. I will grant you though that a .25 inch difference on an Ikon on the same rim made a noticeable difference in volume and pressure I could roll with, and I'm guessing that imparts improvements, so I've considered going to a 2.4. However, the new tread pattern is more densely packed for better rolling efficiency and taller side knobs are there to really dig into the corners. Joe will know that I run a pair of old Forekasters in 2.2 flavour on my 100mm-forked 29er XC hardtail. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. Nobody mentions the Specialized Ground Control? It doesnt have the aggressive squared-off profile some cornering tires prefer, but its more rounded shape also doesnt have any dead zones or major loss of reactivity and grip. I switched that out to a 2.35 Forekaster and it has been on there ever since. Tried one one . We noticed this most on hardpack or sand, while in loose conditions it didnt seem to affect the tyre greatly. Based in Ohio, Zach is now slowly introducing a new generation to cycling and still trying to figure out how to fit the most rides into a busy schedule as a new dad. NZD, Padded / Protective Short Liners / Chamois, Maxxis Ardent/Forekaster Tire Combo: Customer Review, Drilling Holes To Avoid Headset Cable Routing, Brake Pad Compounds & Tons Of New MTB Products Ep. Impetus - Interesting you would say that about liking the Rekon more for a rear. Contis Black Chili compound seems to improve with use. While Ardent tires are very durable and rolling resistance and reactivity dont generally change much with wear, they do tend to become more prone to slips and drifting as they age. The Maxxis Forekaster features a spiky, well-spaced tread pattern that is ideal for XC racing or light duty trail riding in loose or wet conditions during the spring and fall. I got a Forecaster to last 18 months & was amazed to wear it out. I don't know exactly how many miles it has on it probably 600 at a minimum. Still, its always good to chat rubber init. With a tightly packed set of small ramped knobs, the Ikon tire almost feels a bit like velcro in the traction department while rolling fast with ease. Installation of the Ardent is a breeze. I agree with Minimus, the Ardent is not a great tire. . We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. MTB Podcast | When its really dry and dusty I swap it for a slaughter. Like the Ardent, the Forekaster offers very little in the way of rolling resistance and is a quiet ride when the tires are centered. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community. Continue with Recommended Cookies. The Fora platform includes forum software by XenForo. The launch represents the, Canyon updated the Spectral:ON eMTB in 2022, redesigning the entire bike around their in-house developed batteries. The XR4s are quite voluminous for a 2.35 tyre and exhibit a wide footprint. However since you already have them: XC, Road, XXC, Endurance, Mtn, All-Mtn, Cross, Gravel, just go have fun on 2 wheels! product review Honestly, I'd get rid of the Ardent. Just an update for anyone that might have the same question in the future It never gets easier, you just get faster. ~ Greg LeMond. In fact, these two tires are often paired together as they offer a relatively balanced combined performance. The tyres in the shot above were installed at the same time, and you can see how pronounced the rear wear is. Wish manufacturers would target 25lb bikes instead of 30-35 lb for DC/Trail bikes. Maxxis Forekaster Features. Loving this combo at the moment. Tire Currently running a Forekaster up front on a bike and its been great. Once leaned over, the slightly offset two rows of side knobs grab and keep your tires planted on the dirt. RUB When an Aspen in the rear isnt enough (wet Autumn and Winter), I mount an Agressor (god I love this tyre during those months). Learn how your comment data is processed. Support Us | Let's start with the Maxxis Aspen Tires. The Best Bike Seats for Overweight Cyclists, A responsive tire with low rolling resistance, Works well as a front or rear tire, balanced enough to use on both wheels, Good for most mountain trails and moderately aggressive riders, Tread does not perform as well in loose soils or mud, Overall design not as well suited to very aggressive cyclists or the most challenging trails, Newer tires offer a slightly better balance between grip and rolling resistance. Thanks. This new Forekaster looks almost identical to the newer Nic, just with the trademark Maxxis ramped centre tread. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Its designed to handle a wide variety of terrains and trail styles without slowing the rider or offering a lot of rolling resistance. The blocky tread is somewhat of a wonderment, being very grippy on the loose stuff as well as equally adherent on bare rock something we werent expecting. The new Forekaster does appear to make more sense in the Maxxis range. Got a bargain Forekaster/Reckon (front/rear) 2nd hand from a lad who took them unused off his oEM Orbea- delighted to have them and only 40 quid or so. If your your rims are inner width i25mm or wider (which is how most XC bikes come these days), you might consider a 2.6in tire like the Maxxis Rekon. Still feels like it rolls pretty good even mounted reversed. The DHRII has large ramped knobs in the center that take up most of the tread, and then transition to classic Minion side knobs. I personally really like to ride this tire out back, be it a 2.2 or 2.35. You must be logged in to reply to this topic. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. Manage Settings Dual compound or 3C MaxxSpeed options 60 TPI or 120 TPI casing options EXO sidewall protection MrRideAlong - Assuming you were suggesting I upgrade the Rekon to a wider version of what I have, I hesitate to think a .15 inch difference in width would make that big of a difference. I have written countless magazine and website features and route guides for the UK mountain bike press, most notably for the esteemed and highly regarded Singletrackworld. The Ardent Race sees the same tread pattern as its Trail- and Enduro-oriented siblings, but has had a few millimeters snipped off the tread height all around. Strengths: Resilient sidewall. Made from a composite rubber, the light central tread is unlikely to show much wear and tear, even with regular use and difficult terrain. My quoted 2.4in test tire looked great when inflated to 24psi on my 30mm . When you really lean into it the square and H shaped side nobs dig in well and the extra volume helps conform to the trail. Well look at where the Ardent stands out, where it falls a little short, and the differences between front and rear mounting this tire. Theres also very little tuck under risk with the Forekaster, even with the most aggressive out of saddle pedaling, challenging terrain, or now. I'm not sure it's 'that' much slower than the Minion SS. Hopefully, youre not more confused now than before you read this comparison. The UK Government has issued concussion guidance for all grassroots sports. Its a blocky tread that reminds us vaguely of the pattern found on Schwalbes Hans Dampf that cant be a bad thing and was developed with input from freeride guru Richie Schley.
Violence In Washington Square Park, Going The Distance Farmer's Daughter, Duane Miller Obituary Greenville, Ohio, Can You Track Someone On Life360 Without Them Knowing?, Articles M